By Joseph Daniel, ICC Fellow

“It is really disturbing to me whenever a Muslim customer at my office calls me a ‘khawaga,‘ as if I am not an Egyptian, even though my ancestors have been in Egypt longer than any of theirs,” Maged* told me over an Egyptian breakfast.

Khawaga is an Arabic term that has been used to describe Western foreigners living in Egypt, especially during times of past European colonial influence. Sometimes, the word is used by the Egyptian Muslim majority as a derogatory term toward the minority Egyptian Coptic Christians.

Egyptian Christians, collectively also called “Copts,” comprise the largest Christian population in the Middle East and North Africa region. While the exact number and percentage of Christians in Egypt have varied and have not been known exactly since Islam arrived in the 7th century, Christians have been a minority for more than 1,000 years. However, despite that minority status, modern Copts believe that they have a direct heritage to pharaonic period Egyptians and, therefore, predate Islam by 500 years in Egypt. Thus, referring to and likening Egyptian Christians to Western outsiders is deeply derogatory and does not honor or respect Egypt’s Christians’ identity as fully part of Egypt’s society in both past and present.

This subtle yet painful exclusion reflects a deeper psychological and social divide that Egyptian Christians often experience — not one grounded in overt hatred, but in the quiet daily reality of being seen as “other.” For many Copts, it isn’t about animosity toward their Muslim neighbors; it’s about the enduring need to survive in a society where their place is frequently questioned or diminished.

This dynamic gives rise to a powerful mental framework: a world lived in parallel — us and them. It’s not us versus them in the sense of active conflict or hostility (at least not always), but rather a lived separation shaped by centuries of marginalization, discrimination, and insecurity. This mindset helps explain how Egyptian Christians have built tightly knit communities, deep networks of mutual support, and a guarded approach to interaction with the broader society. It is a form of social cohesion forged under pressure — a quiet resilience that sustains identity in the face of subtle and overt exclusion.

The Parallel Worlds: ‘Us‘ and ‘Them’

In Cairo’s densely populated neighborhoods, the division is often invisible to outsiders but acutely felt by those who live there. Egyptian Christians and Muslims share the same apartment buildings, shop in the same markets, and navigate the same traffic-clogged streets, yet they inhabit fundamentally different social worlds.

This separation manifests in countless small ways. If affordable, Christian children often attend private Christian schooling, not necessarily because their parents reject public education, but because these institutions offer safe spaces where their religious identity won’t be questioned or minimized. In the workplace, conversations flow differently depending on who is present — references to religious holidays, weekend plans, or family celebrations, as well as vocabulary and the use of the common Arabic dialect — shift subtly based on the religious composition of the group.

The divide extends beyond mere preference into practical necessity. When my Christian friend Ramses* is looking for an apartment for a family, he will naturally look for neighborhoods with established Christian families and Christian landlords.

“It’s not that they don’t want Muslim neighbors,” he explained, “but I need to know we won’t face questions about our church or other gatherings and that our way of life won’t be seen as strange or inappropriate.”

These parallel worlds operate with their own rhythms, networks, and unspoken rules. They coexist geographically while remaining socially distinct, creating a unique form of parallel worlds that is neither legally mandated nor officially acknowledged, yet profoundly real in its influence on daily life.

III. A Culture of Survival

Over generations, Egyptian Christians have developed what can only be described as a culture of survival — a set of practices, instincts, and community structures designed to preserve identity and provide security in an environment where both can feel perpetually under threat. Christian families gravitate toward Christian-owned businesses, Christian schools, and Christian social circles. It’s a protective instinct that prioritizes cultural and religious integrity over broader social integration. Churches become more than places of worship; they transform into community centers, networking hubs, and sources of practical support ranging from job referrals to marriage introductions.

The strategy is not born from superiority or disdain for others, but from hard-earned centuries of practical thinking about where safety lies. When Om Milad, a Coptic property manager, recommends a repair shop to a new Christian resident, she will suggest a Christian-owned repair shop despite having a closer or cheaper Muslim-owned alternative. She’s making a calculated decision based on decades of experience about where Christians are most likely to receive fair treatment and honest pricing without the potential of being unjustly framed for wrongdoing in a business relationship.

This circling creates dense networks of mutual aid. Christian business owners may sometimes preferentially hire Christian employees, knowing they’re providing opportunities that might be scarce elsewhere. Christian doctors maintain informal referral networks that prioritize community members. Christian teachers take a special interest in Christian students, offering mentorship and guidance that may not be available elsewhere in the educational system.

IV. Protective Instincts and the Next Generation

Perhaps nowhere is the “us and them” mindset more evident than in how Christian parents guide their children’s social relationships. Many Christian families actively discourage deep friendships with Muslim peers, and romantic relationships across religious lines are often considered unthinkable. This protection is especially apparent with Christian girls, particularly in remote rural areas or urban slums, with social circles outside the home with Muslim families carefully guarded lest any kind of forced conversion or pressure be exerted by Muslim males in their Muslim friend’s home.

This guidance doesn’t originally stem from religious hatred or a sense of self-righteous superiority, but from parental fear rooted in lived experience. Parents worry about religious conversion, either forced or through social pressure. They fear that deep relationships with Muslim families might lead to situations where their children feel compelled to minimize or hide their Christian identity. Most painfully, they worry about betrayal — that friendships built on mutual respect might crumble when religious differences become relevant.

V. Economic Loyalty and Exclusion

The economic dimension of the Christian-Muslim divide reveals both the practical consequences of discrimination and the community’s adaptive responses. In Egypt’s competitive job market, religious identity often influences hiring decisions in ways that are rarely explicit but frequently decisive.

Christian professionals regularly report experiences of losing job opportunities or facing workplace discrimination because of their religious background. Some describe being passed over for promotions despite superior qualifications, or finding their career advancement stalled once their Christian identity becomes known to Muslim supervisors or colleagues. Some career professions, ranging from Arabic language teachers to professional soccer players, face societal barriers for Christians to enter.

In response, Christian communities have developed parallel economic networks that provide both opportunity and security. Christian business owners actively recruit Christian employees, creating employment pipelines that bypass potentially discriminatory mainstream hiring processes. Professional associations within the Christian community facilitate networking, mentorship, and business development in ways that might not occur in mixed religious settings.

This economic self-reliance creates a kind of “loyalty loop” — Christians protect Christians economically, not merely out of religious preference, but as a practical response to systemic exclusion. A Christian family might choose a Christian doctor, accountant, or contractor not because they assume superior service, but because they know their business helps sustain community members who might otherwise struggle to find economic opportunities.

The Cost of the Divide

When communities retreat into parallel worlds, something profound is lost for both Christians and Muslims in Egypt. The growing separation means fewer opportunities for the kind of deep, formative relationships that shape understanding and build bridges across differences. We fear what we don’t know, and as interactions become increasingly superficial or absent altogether, each community becomes more abstract and less human to the other.

Consider what happens when Christian and Muslim children grow up without genuine friendships across religious lines. They miss the moderating influence of personal relationships that humanize “the other.” Without shared memories of playing together, studying together, or navigating childhood challenges side by side, they enter adulthood with inherited assumptions rather than lived experience. The Muslim who has never had a close Christian friend may find it easier to accept generalizations about Christian loyalty or intentions. The Christian who has never been welcomed into a Muslim home may struggle to see beyond stereotypes about Muslim attitudes toward minorities.

This educational isolation is perpetuated by textbooks that often minimize or misrepresent Christianity’s role in Egyptian history, contributing to the very ignorance that fuels separation. When Muslim students learn little about how Christianity was Egypt’s majority religion for centuries before Islam’s arrival, or how Coptic Christians preserved and transmitted much of ancient Egyptian culture, they lose crucial context for understanding their Christian peers as integral to Egyptian identity rather than foreign elements. A more honest curriculum that acknowledges Christian contributions to Egypt’s development — from architectural marvels to educational institutions — and includes meaningful input from Christian educators could help young Egyptians develop the cross-cultural understanding necessary to bridge generational divides.

This separation also deprives Egyptian society of the full participation of its Christian community. For centuries, Egyptian Christians have made significant contributions to education, healthcare, and commerce in the region. Their schools, hospitals, and businesses have served all Egyptians, regardless of their religion, creating institutions that have become pillars of Egyptian civil society. When Christians retreat into protective enclaves, this broader societal contribution diminishes.

The loss extends beyond practical contributions to the realm of mutual enrichment. Simple gestures that once bridged communities — Muslims learning about Christian holidays, Christians participating in Ramadan iftars, neighbors checking on each other during religious observances — become rare. These small acts of curiosity and care, while seemingly minor, create the fabric of shared citizenship that makes diversity sustainable.

Perhaps most significantly, the separation limits Christians’ ability to fulfill what many see as their calling to be a positive influence in the broader society. The Christian tradition speaks of believers as “salt and light,” preserving and illuminating the communities they inhabit. When fear drives Christians into isolation, they lose opportunities to demonstrate the love and service that their faith calls them to offer. The principles that emphasize loving one’s neighbor and serving others become constrained by the need for self-protection.

Conclusion

The “us and them” mindset that characterizes Egyptian Christian communities represents neither paranoia nor prejudice, but rather a sophisticated survival adaptation developed over centuries of minority existence. It reflects the dignity and resilience of a community that has found ways to preserve identity, provide mutual support, and maintain hope despite persistent marginalization.

Yet, this survival adaptation comes at a cost — to individual freedom, cross-cultural understanding, and at times the broader promise of Egyptian national unity. The parallel worlds that provide security also perpetuate division, limiting the full flourishing of both Christian communities and Egyptian society.

Understanding this dynamic requires recognizing that the choice to live in parallel worlds isn’t freely made but emerges from rational responses to real experiences of exclusion and discrimination. Actual change would require not just individual courage to cross divides, but systemic transformation that makes such crossing safe and beneficial for everyone involved. This includes educational reforms that present Egypt’s whole historical and cultural tapestry honestly, giving Christian educators a voice in shaping how their community is represented to future generations, and creating opportunities for young people to develop the interfaith competencies that could gradually heal these divisions.

*Names have been changed to protect individual privacy.

To read more news stories, visit the ICC Newsroom. For interviews, please email press@persecution.org. To support ICC’s work around the world, please give to our Where Most Needed Fund.