ICC Note: In the below article provided by Mission Network News, author Ruth Kramer points out that the United States has “no comprehensive policy” for helping persecuted Christians or other religious groups. This lack of a framework not only shows how little the United States prioritizes religious persecution in it’s foreign policy, but is a missed opportunity to promote religious freedom for millions and greater protections for those facing violence and discrimination because of their faith.
9/29/2014 United States (MNN) – Religious freedom is at risk. How the United States deals with it sets the stage for global credibility on similar issues.
Todd Nettleton, a spokesman for the Voice of the Martyrs USA, explains, “The State Department issues a report. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom issues a report. But the reality is, this administration has not placed an emphasis on religious freedom.”
Nettleton goes on to clarify that the Office of International Religious Freedom is headed by the Ambassador-at-large, hence the problem. “This Ambassador for International Religious Freedom is a post that’s been vacant for about half of the Obama Administration, so it’s clearly not something that they are putting a high priority on.”
With ISIS, Boko Haram, and al-Shabaab making advances, carving out caliphates, and demanding recognition, this is an issue that has national security attached. Slow movement on filling the post is costly. “That affects our standing in the world. When we go to hold other countries accountable, we have clearly said by our actions, ‘This is not that big a deal to us.’ That decreases our ability to go to other countries and ask them for better treatment of religious minorities.”
A recent congressional oversight committee hearing was held to check on government compliance with the International Religious Freedom Law. Although the law was passed 16 years ago, this is the first time Congress has checked on whether the State Department is implementing it.
A panel of advocates told the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on national security that the United States needs to both strengthen its religious freedom policies and take more seriously the position of the ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom.
In October 2013, the sitting Ambassador-at-large Suzanne Johnson Cook resigned the post. It took until late July 2014 for a new nomination. The new nominee is Rabbi David Saperstein.
Seems like progress, and yet, there are more delays. Nettleton blames mid-term elections. “I don’t anticipate that there will be any significant changes between now and the elections. I think after the elections, there is at least the possibility that there will be a change. Obviously, it’s a new season.”
All the time the post was vacant means that the United States has had virtually no impact on the global rise of religious persecution. While American diplomats have helped in individual cases, there has been no comprehensive policy in place to help the millions who suffer because of their faith.
What would change this? Training for State Department workers, giving the ambassador-at-large more clout, and asking high-ranking officials to speak out on the importance of religious freedom. All three items were part of the recommendations made to the oversight committee.
…
