Giving hope to persecuted Christians since 1995
Select Page

Fla. County Board Reverses Decision, Allows Church to Erect Cross
ICC Note: In yet another example of zoning laws being used by local officials in the U.S. to place undue burden on churches and Christian organizations, a Florida church has finally been allowed to erect a cross on its 11-acre property in Charlotte County. It took the church six years of legal battles before a court ordered that the cross could be erected after zoning officials decided to classify the cross as “sign” and said it fell under zoning restrictions for signs.
2/19/2013 United States (CN) -After nearly six years of effort, culminating in a yearlong battle with the zoning board in Charlotte County, Fla., Lutheran Church of the Cross in Port Charlotte will now be able to build a 60-foot monument cross on its 11-acre property. Last week, the Charlotte County Board of Commissioners voted 4-0 to instruct zoning staff to reexamine whether the monument cross should be classified as a “sign” or as a “structure” and “work of art.”
In March, the zoning board denied the church’s request because the board misclassified the freestanding cross as a “sign.” The cross exceeded the acceptable specifications under the inapplicable sign ordinance: 40 feet high and 150 square feet maximum area. The cross as designed is 60 feet high with 2,400 square feet of area.
“Charlotte County’s intransigent classification of the church’s monument cross as a ‘sign’ after expressing concerns about what non-Christians might think of the church’s monument cross exposes the County to liability,” Liberty Counsel wrote in a letter to the Charlotte County Board of Commissioners. “At a minimum, the County’s misclassification and continued delay is a violation of the church’s rights under Florida’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the church’s First Amendment rights, and its rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.”
“The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 has made clear that when evaluating restrictions on the free exercise of religion, only those restrictions that are the least restrictive have the chance of passing constitutional muster,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “When the zoning board classified the cross as a ‘sign’ on the basis that it might offend someone, it imposed an unconstitutional restriction,” Staver said.

[Full Story]