Rescuing and serving persecuted Christians since 1995
Select Page

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/20/AR2005082001202.html

By Ellen Knickmeyer, Washington Post Foreign Service – Kurdish politicians negotiating a draft constitution have criticised the US ambassador to Iraq for allegedly pushing them to accept too great a role for Islamic law in the US drive to complete the charter on time…Delegates said distribution of oil revenue dominated the talks but no agreement was reached. Shiite Arab, Kurdish and Sunni Muslim factions differ on how much revenue should be controlled by a federal Iraqi government and how it should be divided. But the question of Islamic law drew strong public protests from Kurds. The current working draft of the constitution stipulates that no law can contradict Islamic principles. In talks with Shiite religious parties, Kurdish negotiators said they had pressed unsuccessfully to limit the definition of Islamic law to agreed-upon religious principles. The Kurds said current language in the constitutional draft would subject Iraqis to extreme interpretations. Kurds also contend provisions in the draft would allow Islamic clerics to serve on the high court that would interpret the constitution. That would potentially subject marriage, divorce, inheritance and other civil matters to religious law, and could harm women’s rights in particular, Kurdish negotiators and some women’s groups said. Mr Khalilzad had specifically supported those provisions, urging other groups to accept them, according to Kurds involved in the talks…“These things are not good — giving the constitution an Islamic face. It is not good to have a constitution that would limit the liberties of people, the human rights, the freedoms,” Mr. Othman said…[Go To Full Story]